If you have middle-aged eyes like mine, click to enlarge.
When previous incidents erupted - and when the supposed Online Integritude project was launched - ARA was still on hiatus. However, via their blogs, I was still keeping track of my blog buddies from four years ago. So I remember these "incidents" well, and my palpable sense of outrage at the time.
Since relaunching ARA, I’ve stayed away from blogfights generally, and I’ve avoided Tacky and Pasty like the plague, because, well, really, who would want to read these guys voluntarily? Pompous-ass prose used to make veiled and unveiled threats against people who disagree with them or who call bullshit on their lack of logic, all underlaid with a tone of smarmy self-righteousness leavened with more than a dash of persecution complex - these types are everywhere. Tacky and Pasty are neither new nor original, and they don’t even do it particularly well.
But this is ridiculous.
Now, I don’t know The Boyz from S,N!; I have never so much as corresponded with one of them, including HTML Mencken, who is the target of their psychopathy. But I do know good writing when I see it, and Mencken’s one of the better ones in the blogosphere. (The entire S,N! stable is brimming with talent and wit, but Mencken has an unusual ability to combine deadly serious subject matter, a solid grounding in facts, and razor-sharp snarkability into something not only readable but immensely entertaining.) Which, frankly, is probably the root of the problem, considering the stilted, turgid crap churned out by T & P.
This has gone way beyond the pale. T & P (Tacky particularly, it seems) have an unhealthy obsession with outing liberal bloggers. Anything’s an excuse to indulge in this favorite of pastimes: Tacky’s current pretensions to purpose have to do with Mencken’s supposed theft posting of his precious wedding photos. First, it was one photo - one. Second, no one would ever have known it was a wedding photo if Tacky didn’t keep reminding us - I have to admit that I’ve never been to a wedding where the groom, in silky blue open-necked shirt, enthusiastically channeled Han Solo with a light sabre. (And I gotta tell ya, if I were the groom in question, I sure as hell wouldn’t admit that it was me.) Third, it’s way past time for some sense of proportion here. Posting a Photoshopped image of a publicly-available photo becomes grounds for outing a pseudonymous blogger for the sole purpose of attempting to damage him in some way? Please.
Take a look at the slide above; it lists defining characteristics of psychopathy. Pay special attention to items 5 through 9, 11, and 13.
S,N! has now been hijacked for two days because of this bullshit. T & P are apparently furiously Googling their names and hitting refresh every few seconds, trying to find every new blog post about this mess and hump the comments threads with spurious defenses and new threats. Ordinarily, I’d assume that this isn’t a big enough blog to catch anyhone’s attention, but with this kind of obsessiveness, who knows? So, a warning: Troll the comments threads all you want. There, your words will be held up for all to see, and subject to the derision, scorn, ridicule, pick-your-poison that they so richly deserve. There will be no engagement, no response (except to delete identifying information of anyone either chooses to out, which Tacky, at least, has been doing wholesale in other people’s comment threads).
And that, my dears, is the key: Ignore these spoiled childish fucks. Quit giving them what they want. Post your criticism of them and/or your support of their targets. And then let them rail in the comments to their little blackened hearts’ content . . . to be roundly ignored. If they don’t have anything better to do with their lives than piss into the wind - well, let ‘em. This behavior should be condemned. It should never be engaged.

great post. someone is gonna get serioulsy hurt one of these days. the handwring and blaming that will ensue will start the cycle over again. be safe out there, rational animal.
Comment by erizzle — February 25, GMT @ 23:2532 PM
But if I can’t poke at the wingnuts with a stick, I’m gonna have to go back to pulling wings off flies…
Comment by NTodd — February 26, GMT @ 00:2655 AM
Thanks, erizzle. Your point is one of the things that worries me. Some of these people are truly unhinged, and they’re clearly constantly spoiling for an opportunity to fan what we all thought were long-dead flames into a whole new conflagration.
I need to blog pseudonymously; I can’t do this under my own name. But even if I did blog under my own name, I can’t envision myself ever outing a right-wing blogger. If I were being stalked [true stalking, not online derision], I can see myself reporting that person’s identity to the police, but outing someone to the blogosphere because - what? He said mean things about my logical capacity? And when yous trip away the layers of bullshit, that’s what this episode amounts to, frankly.
Comment by Administrator — February 26, GMT @ 00:2632 AM
NTodd, your very existence pokes at them with a stick.
Besides, don’t go bringing up things like sticks when Pasty is the topic of discussion - enough phallic issues there already . . . .
Comment by Administrator — February 26, GMT @ 00:2659 AM
Yes, I have middle-aged *chuckles* or older eyes, but I was able to view the .gif after clicking. Did you notice that “minor” is misspelled as “miner,” then there is “Aanti” and the syntax is, well, muddy to sloppy in places? It makes me seriously question the validity of it. Why say a Standard Psychological Text? At the base level it would be a “standard psychology text,” but why not name it, if it is a real source?
Note, please, I am not criticizing you, just applying critical thinking to what I see in the .gif.
Comment by little green — February 26, GMT @ 00:2601 AM
Yeah, little green, I know. You’re absolutely right. It was actually one of a series of slides from someone’s presentation; the presentation as a whole had cites, etc. But I was a) tired, and b) feeling rushed for non-blogging-related reasons, and since I recognized the content of the slide (if not the spelling, syntax, etc.), I just grabbed it.
I’m usually a hard-ass about my research, as my blog buddies will probably tell you. But when I threw this post up, I wanted a quick and dirty image that would make the point, so I could get on to other things I needed to be doing besides blogging. Not up to my usual standards at all - but then again, this is T&P we’re talking about, after all . . . .
And no worries: Your comments were not taken as criticism - or, rather, they were taken as constructive criticism and a valid point that I expected to arise. Unlike the subjects of said post, I don’t regard pointing out potential flaws in my argument (or its “accessories”) as outing-worthy blog-stalking.
Comment by Administrator — February 26, GMT @ 00:2625 AM
I wonder… could we persuade Mad Kane to write a parody “Blog Stalking” to the tune of “Jive Talking”? Yeah, I know; the Bee Gees are ancient history by now, but think of the possibilities:
Blog Stalking… you’re publishing lies,
Yeah, Blog Stalking… can’t wear my disguise…
… etc.
Anyone of any political stripe who sets out to cause bloggers problems in their real-world lives deserves legal action. I haven’t followed the story in question… too much crap to read, and I read plenty already… but I can’t help hoping the perp’s one day find themselves in the dock for crossing the wrong person, say, a law blogger.
I blog under (more-or-less) my own name. That’s an old habit that is probably not an especially good idea in this day and age, but it’s too late for me to change now.
Comment by Steve Bates — February 26, GMT @ 00:2630 AM
Steve, I think you and Mad should co-write it!
Comment by Administrator — February 26, GMT @ 01:2620 AM