<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brava!</title>
	<link>http://arationalanimal.blogsome.com/2007/07/18/brava/</link>
	<description>Law, Native American Issues, Progressive Politics, and Whatever Happens to Piss Me Off Today</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://arationalanimal.blogsome.com/2007/07/18/brava/#comment-149</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:47:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://arationalanimal.blogsome.com/2007/07/18/brava/#comment-149</guid>
					<description>Thank you, Steve.  You don't know how good it made me feel to see that &quot;We need you!&quot;

I'm with you on the impeachment thing, too.  I've been so outraged by Pelosi's &amp;amp; Reid's &quot;off the table&quot; bullshit:  first, because it's not solely their decision - it's OURS; and second, because I honestly don't believe that this country can (or deserves) to regain its status on the world stage until it demonstrates that it takes such criminality seriously and deals with it accordingly.  And since our Constitution has provided explicitly for such circumstances via impeachment, nI regard a blanket refusal to consider it also to be criminal.  Particularly when the same fuckwits now screaming &quot;Partisanship!&quot; are the same ones who couldn't wait to use it to impeach Teh Clenis for encountering Monica's lips (another exercise in criminality, if you ask me - the impeachment, I mean, not the hummer).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thank you, Steve.  You don&#8217;t know how good it made me feel to see that &#8220;We need you!&#8221;</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m with you on the impeachment thing, too.  I&#8217;ve been so outraged by Pelosi&#8217;s &amp; Reid&#8217;s &#8220;off the table&#8221; bullshit:  first, because it&#8217;s not solely their decision - it&#8217;s OURS; and second, because I honestly don&#8217;t believe that this country can (or deserves) to regain its status on the world stage until it demonstrates that it takes such criminality seriously and deals with it accordingly.  And since our Constitution has provided explicitly for such circumstances via impeachment, nI regard a blanket refusal to consider it also to be criminal.  Particularly when the same fuckwits now screaming &#8220;Partisanship!&#8221; are the same ones who couldn&#8217;t wait to use it to impeach Teh Clenis for encountering Monica&#8217;s lips (another exercise in criminality, if you ask me - the impeachment, I mean, not the hummer).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve Bates</title>
		<link>http://arationalanimal.blogsome.com/2007/07/18/brava/#comment-144</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:05:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://arationalanimal.blogsome.com/2007/07/18/brava/#comment-144</guid>
					<description>It's really good to see you back here, Lilith. I'm sorry you've been beset by so many troubles, but at least the Senate slumber party, followed by Reid's withdrawal of the bill from consideration, is cause for legitimate hope. The R's are trying to spin this as a Dem loss, but anyone who thinks that really isn't paying attention.

Next on my wish list: I want Pelosi to put impeachment back on the table. I understand why she said what she did, but IMHO she has a constitutional duty here, and no right to set aside the one best tool available to her for checking a rampant executive branch.

Write when you can, Lilith. We need you!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s really good to see you back here, Lilith. I&#8217;m sorry you&#8217;ve been beset by so many troubles, but at least the Senate slumber party, followed by Reid&#8217;s withdrawal of the bill from consideration, is cause for legitimate hope. The R&#8217;s are trying to spin this as a Dem loss, but anyone who thinks that really isn&#8217;t paying attention.</p>
	<p>Next on my wish list: I want Pelosi to put impeachment back on the table. I understand why she said what she did, but IMHO she has a constitutional duty here, and no right to set aside the one best tool available to her for checking a rampant executive branch.</p>
	<p>Write when you can, Lilith. We need you!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
