A Rational Animal

Rethuggery, Nattering Nutjobs, SCLM StupidityMarch 31, IST 07:3150 AM

 

I haven’t had the [dis]pleasure of seeing this ad on TV yet, despite the fact the McMaverick chose my state (WTF?) to launch it.  However, all the coverage of it that I’ve seen thus far focuses only on the redundant ineptness of the wording - missing the real point.  The ad’s closer:

 

"John McCain: The American president Americans have been waiting for."

 

It neglected to add:

"This slander brought to you courtesy of the StraitJacket Express<sup>TM</sup>." 

There.  Fixed. 

Seriously, here we have the first preview of what September will look like.  Forget the swiping (OMG, plagiarizing!) of Obama’s "we are the ones we’ve been waiting for" sentiment.  They key here is the racist, nationalist dog-whistle - one which, I guarantee you, will come through loud and clear to a large percentage of this state’s population:

"The American president . . . ."

Because, you know, that angry Negro with the funny name and the (ZOMG, Muslim!!!one!!eleven!!!) father from someplace in darkest Africa - well, we all know he’s not a Real American.  After all, he’s African!  (And black!)  And Muslim!  (And black!)  And miscegenated!  (And black!)  And Muslim!  (And black!)  And with a crazy, racist, terrorist-loving Christian preacher!  (And black!)

Note also the use of the article:  "The American president," not "An American president."  Just in case, you know, you were inclined to give McMaverick the benefit of the doubt or anything.  Or, for the dog-whistle crowd, just in case you were thinking maybe he was including Obama in the pool of legitimate candidates.

No, to McMaverick, there’s only one legitimate candidate:  the white guy.  It doesn’t matter that he’s a hypocritical, ethically-challenged, bigoted, lunatic nut job - he’s white!  He’s "The American."

And a few more bearings fall out of the wheels as the StraitJacket Express<sup>TM</sup> rolls on down the highway . . . . 

I wonder how long before it runs off the road, crashing into a public square and mowing down all the innocents in its path?  Of course, when it does, the media will be sure to bring us The Whole Story, complete with expert analysis about how the fact that McMaverick was tortured makes him a Great War Hero, and thus, all the dead pedestrians are simply martyrs to the noble cause of perpetuating that narrative.

Rethuggery, Nattering Nutjobs, SCLM StupidityMarch 10, GMT 12:1029 PM

 

A quick note on the yesterday’s media-related posts from Matt Stoller and Molly I:  They’re both partly right.  In different ways, they both miss the real point.

Referring to the testy exchange between McMaverick and Elizabeth Bumiller, Matt wonders why the sudden change in the coverage of McCain.  I should’ve thought the answer was obvious:  For Villager Media, anything St. McMaverick says goes - unless and until he makes One Of Their Own look bad.  And since he got snippy with One Of Their Own - a stenographer who’s prostituted herself so publicly in the service of Bush’s agenda - he must be disciplined.  Publicly.

You’re welcome. 

Molly I., on the other hand, simply didn’t take her argument to its logical conclusion.  [Disclaimer:  I read Molly I’s takedowns of MoDo religiously.  Hell, I read her takedowns of everyone religiously.]

Molly finally begins to suss out what’s really at work in MoDo’s "coverage" of Clinton and Obama:  It’s The Graduate all over again.  And she’s right.

Except . . . .

In MoDo World, Hillary is not Mrs. Robinson - MoDo herself is.  And that’s why, in MoDo World, Obama must be disciplined, too.  Good-looking younger guy - who the hell does he think he is, not recognizing that he must bow before the altar of MoDo?  I mean, really - wasting all those looks and all that charm and all that oratory on the great unwashed voting masses, when he should know that the first priority of every presidential candidate (and every male) should be to court MoDo’s own twisted affections and affectations.

You’re welcome. 

 

Spineless Dems, Rethuggery, Nattering Nutjobs, SCLM StupidityFebruary 14, GMT 07:1431 AM

 

Links finally added, here.

Spineless Dems, Rethuggery, Nattering Nutjobs, SCLM StupidityFebruary 09, GMT 05:913 AM

 

Links added here

(Incidentally, amassing them subjected me to an exhausting trawl through the cobwebbed psychopathic corners of the Rethug mind.  I wonder whether the Obama campaign would be willing to pay for the therapy I’ll so obviously need after that . . . ?)

War Criminals, Spineless Dems, Rethuggery, Nattering Nutjobs 05:946 AM

. . . this was on the front page of the digital WaPo at 4:30 this morning.  (I guarantee you that it won’t still be there once Teh Villagers are up.)

This is why we have to vote.

This is why we have to fight.

This is why we have to impeach, convict, indict, hang.

 

* Photo of war crime victim by Andrea Bruce, The Washington Post 

Spineless Dems, Rethuggery, SCLM Stupidity, Props and ThanksFebruary 02, GMT 07:214 AM

 
Image copyright Steve Bates

Many thanks to the irrepressible and irreplaceable Steve Bates at the YDD for the links.  And while I’m at it, I want to return the favor:  Steve’s post, "What Edwards Accomplished," underscores some important points that I failed to make about the role that Edwards has played in this primary.  As he notes, we owe Edwards a debt of gratitude for (among many other things) making the subjects of this campaign relevant to ordinary folks. 

That’s one too-seldom-recognized element of the GOP’s success:  It couches its corporatist, expansionist, fundamentalist agendas in faux-populist rhetoric to persuade voters that it really is watching out for the little guy.  Of course, nothing could be further from the truth, but the Rethugs have been veritable geniuses at it.  And so racism becomes about "illegal immigration," which morphs magically into "protecting jobs," and criminal lawbreaking becomes about "catching terrorists," which transmogrifies into "protecting children," and so on and so forth down the slippery slope to authoritarian hell.

What Edwards has managed to do - and this is one of the reason Teh Villagers hate him so for being so "angry" - is to turn the GOP’s bullshit rhetoric inside-out (or rather, to take rhetoric that’s already inside-out and turn it back to reality), by breaking down the establishment agenda into terms that are relevant to ordinary people’s lives.  Doing so has shown average voters that, in fact, voting Rethug is not in their own self-interest, long-term or otherwise.

And I still say, vote Edwards.  It’s time to hold his delegates hostage until we extract some real action from the eventual nominee. 

Uncategorized, Spineless Dems, Rethuggery, Nattering Nutjobs, SCLM StupidityJanuary 04, GMT 18:455 PM

 

[Ed. note:  Very short on time today; I promise a real post tomorrow.  For now, read someone who GETS IT.]

For my money (okay, not for my money, since I wouldn’t pay a red cent any more for Len Downie’s rag, but still . . .), there are exactly three journalists at WaPo:  Froomkin, Priest, and Robinson.  Note that I did not say "three decent journalists," or any such variation; I said "three journalists," period.  The rest are stenographers, at best (and that’s only by giving them an unholy benefit of the doubt, something I don’t for a moment).

Anyway, as the post-Iowa wankery continues unabated in most quarters, it’s refreshing to read someone like Gene.  HE GETS IT.  The rest of you out whores out there, take note.

For openers:

I’ve said it before, but it bears repeating: People in Washington really should get out more.

To which, of course, we normal folks are tempted to say, "No shit."  Or maybe I mean "Amen."  Or something.  Let’s go with "No shit," since it’ll get Broderella’s knickers in a twist.

Gene rightly points out that Teh Villagers need not actually live inside Teh Beltway - in fact, I’d say it’s a good bet most of them don’t, even those who work inside it.  Too many scary brown people, doncha know.  Much safer in Alexandria, or Takoma Park, or some other nice white area.  But in the words of the man himself:

 

By "Washington," I mean not just the city but the state of mind, and by "get out," I mean spend time surrounded not just by a different geography but by a different demography as well. If we did, the high-blown debates we have here — and by "we," I mean politicians, lobbyists, advocates, bureaucrats, scholars, journalists and all the rest trapped in the Washington echo chamber — might bear more relation to what people who live outside our bubble think of as reality.

 

He offers reactions to the Bhutto assassination as Exhibit A, but Exhibit B is what really curls my toes:

In Washington, it is conventionally wise to think of government gridlock as basically a good thing, even something that most Americans approve of. To have a president from one party and a Congress controlled — or at least reined in — by the other, we tell ourselves, prevents too-abrupt shifts in policy. Gridlock is supposed to force bipartisan consensus, which is held as a kind of Holy Grail, the only way to tackle the nation’s biggest problems.

But tell that to Iowans — or residents of most states, for that matter — who either don’t have health insurance or can’t get insurance companies to pay their medical bills. Tell it to Arizonans who have pressed their state government to implement its own immigration policy — shouldering what is clearly a federal responsibility — because Washington can’t get its act together. Tell it to military families, some in favor of the war in Iraq and some against, whose lives have been turned upside down by extended deployments with no end in sight.

Oh, yes, yes, YES!!!!!  Sing it, baby!

But from the conversations I had with Iowans, it seemed clear to me that change is also shorthand for the disconnect between the Washington state of mind and the widespread expectation, hardly unreasonable, that this city ought to actually get something done every once in a while.

Whether it gets done after a bare-knuckle brawl or a chorus of "Kumbaya" really doesn’t matter.

Exactly.  And Villagers, lemme tell ya, fuck "Kumbaya."  We want the bare-knuckled brawl.  Because it’s the only way we’ll actually get anything done - you know, that "anything" for which we pay you so handsomely.  Your precious bipartisanship accomplishes - what?  Illegal wars, health-care crises, housing meltdowns, planetary meltdowns . . . and you want us to thank you, while scuffing our toes and pleading in supplication, "Please, sir, may I have some more?"  Fuck you with cast-iron adjustable-rate mortgage.

Finally, Gene describes Teh Villagers thusly:

an alien invasion of know-it-alls from Washington who descended to examine the locals as if they were specimens in a laboratory.

He includes himself in that assessment, which I think is a bit of unnecessary self-criticism.  But his basic point is dead-on.  Because, you see, to Teh Villagers, we’re not actually people:  We’re just a nation of soggy socks waiting for the salvation of their own personal spin cycles. 

Well, I got news for ya:  Go knit your own damn socks for a change.  See what honest labor feels like - if, of course, the shock to your system doesn’t kill you.

Rethuggery, SCLM StupidityAugust 15, IST 21:1559 PM

 

Worried that WaPo won’t provide its daily dose of wankery without Karl Rove in the White House?

Fear not, for I bring you tidings of great . . . erm . . . jackassery, maybe?

This is actually a few days old, but sadly, I’ve been too busy to post.  I did, however, have the presence of mind to grab a couple quick screencaps.  From the main page of Sunday’s WaPo:

 

Yeah, ut’s a thumb; click on it to see it at normal size.  Pay particular attention to the caption underneath the first full hed, center column.  I’ll wait. 

Uh-huh.  That’s it.  Yep.

"White House used terror threat to resurrect Cold War-era wiretap powers over Democrat objections."

"Democrat objections???"

Freddie, boy, what the fuck is that?  I mean, I realize you’ve been a sell-out for, oh, like forever, but on the fucking front page?

No, Freddie, it’s not because you didn’t have the space.  That’s called "kerning," and your copy folks know how to use it.   So you could’ve said, oh, say, "Democratic objections" - as in, you know, the actual name of the party.  If the "-ic" was too much for your pearl-clutching little self to handle, you could’ve said, say, "Democrats’ objections." 

But you know what, Freddie?  None of that matters.  I’m not fucking impressed.  Because on the jump page, you got it right:

 

Exact same goddamn caption. Repeat after me:  Exact same goddamn caption.  With one glaring exception:  "Democratic" is spelled correctly, Freddie.

So again, I ask:  What the fuck is this?  

I know the answer, of course:  It’s your regular Sunday Valentine to Bush, Cheney, Rove, et al. 

I await with bated breath* your display of even-handed objectivity, iin which you caption a Sunday front-page hed with a reference to the "Repubs."

*Not so much.  I’d prefer to live a little while longer. 

War Criminals, Spineless Dems, Rethuggery, Health and WelfareAugust 07, IST 09:739 AM

 

They seem to be everywhere right now:  in my life, in the country’s life, in that of the entire planet.

Apologies to all who’ve visited over the last two or three weeks.  After my father’s death, of course, I had to do the things that attend a death in today’s society:  beginning the task of sorting through his belongings; writing his obituary; picking up his ashes from the funeral home; fulfiling certain traditional obligations.  In the middle of all of this (unsurprisingly, I suppose), my autoimmune disease decided that it was time for an exacerbation, which has turned out to be the worst one I’ve had in recent memory.  Life ground to a halt.

I’m slowly (but surely, I think) on the mend - in part because I’m now at Home #2, and getting a little R-and-R.  The shot above was taken from the deck here the day after Dad’s death, but we’ve gotten the same wave of storms every day since, including a spectacular lightning show last night.   Unfortunately, it’s haying season, and this puts me in a position I don’t think I’ve ever occupied before:  praying for no rain.  In a desert climate like this, you learn not to argue with rain whenever or however it wants to make an appearance.  But after a solid month of daily storms (and the loss of the last cut of hay about six weeks ago, again, to too much moisture), I’m literally praying for a three- or four-day window of bone-dry weather.

It seems like a metaphor for our times, with storm clouds amassed in every direction, and drenching us on a daily basis.  We were talking this morning over coffee about the FISA fiasco - neither of us thinks that we’re going to get our country back absent a major societal upheaval.  Once our "leaders" give away our most fundamental rights, it’s nearly impossible to get them back.  I mean, does anyone really think that Hillary, if she wins, is going to give back the FISA expansion - or the gutting of habeas corpus, or any of the myriad other thefts of constitutional protections that this pack of criminals has wrought?  (Or any of the other candidates, for that matter?)

I didn’t think so. 

So while I’m happy to be feeling a little better personally, I increasingly despair for my country.  Strike that - for the world.  Because what our "leaders" do in our name affects the entire planet.

Which is another reason I continue to insist that impeachment, trial, and conviction are the moral imperatives of our time.  Our obligations now go far beyond the U.S. - certainly beyond parochial worries about keeping certain Democrats in office.  We now owe the world an enormous moral debt - one whose tally climbs every hour.  And we can only begin to repay the smallest, most superficial part of that debt once we take these first necessary legal steps.  It’s how we show the world that we recognize the tragedy and obscenity of what this nation has wrought - and it’s the precondition to regaining the tiniest, most fundamental bit of moral authority as a nation.

[Sigh . . . .]  You’re right.  I’m not holding out hope, either. 

Spineless Dems, RethuggeryJuly 18, IST 13:1843 PM

 

 

I get so fed up with the Dems and their poll-tested and focus-grouped Beltway-insider spinelessness.  While I’m glad to see Harry Reid sticking it to the Rethugs tonight on the Senate floor - and forcing virtually all of the Upper House to earn its collective salary, for a change - if the Dems had had any balls in the first place, there’d be no need for tonight’s display.

On the other hand, it’s hardly worth hiking my blood pressure over the Rethugs:  They sold their collective soul for 30 pieces of fundy silver years ago, and their constant pimping for Bush and his minions simply underscores their essential and toxic combination of fascism and cowardice.

That said, every once in a while, a member of that party occasionally shows both spine and honesty.

I’ve been watching the Senate debate on C-SPAN since it began earlier today.  Most of it has been relatively unremarkable, except for the predictable Rethug pettiness and the equally predictable chickenhawk whoring of Traitor Joe Lieberman.  But now, at 2:50AM EDT, Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME), has just wrapped up some of the most pointed - and thereby courageous - remarks of the debate thus far.  Unlike her GOP colleagues, like the timid Susan Collins or erstwhile sellout John Warner, Snowe has just stuck it to Bush and the Rethugs, twisted the knife, and openly endorsed the Reed-Levin Amendment.  And she bluntly put the lie to her own party’s favorite canards, including the tired old tropes that Iraq is somehow not currently mired in a civil war, that "more time" is all the surge needs to work, and that somehow Reed-Levin = "precipitous withdrawal." 

[And equally predictably, Mad John McCain has popped up like a demented jack-in-the-box to come unglued once again.  Once of the reasons I’m determined to watch this all night is that I want to witness the moment when his campaign finally implodes into toxic dust as he loses it on the floor of the Senate and either assaults a Dem or causees his own head to explode.]

 

I wonder how long references to Snowe in the media will continue to sport the "R" tag.  Considering the maladministration’s insistence on complete fealty, my guess is not long.

Oh, and Dems?  More like this from you, mmmkay?